Which testing technique emphasizes assessing product risks?

Risk-based testing is a technique that prioritizes testing efforts based on the potential risks associated with the product being tested. The primary goal of this approach is to identify and mitigate risks that could negatively impact the project's success. In this context, risks can relate to various factors, such as usability, performance, security, and functionality. By focusing on areas of highest risk, testers can allocate their resources more effectively, ensuring that critical functionalities are thoroughly tested while lower-risk areas may receive less attention.

This technique typically involves analyzing the product's features and assessing them according to their likelihood of failure and the impact those failures would have on the user or the business. Thus, risk-based testing not only helps in enhancing the quality of the software but also in providing stakeholders with assurance that the most significant risks have been addressed.

In contrast, other testing methods may not place as strong an emphasis on risk assessment. Experience-based testing relies on the tester's intuition and past experiences to drive testing efforts. Random testing involves selecting inputs randomly, which may not focus on addressing specific risks. Ad-hoc testing is informal and unstructured, lacking a systematic approach to identifying or prioritizing risks. Therefore, risk-based testing stands out as the method designed specifically to assess and manage product risks effectively